Board of Education v. Illinois State Board of Education’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 federal appellate · 21 district · 2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “anything from `the physical school attended by a child [to] the abstract goals of a child's IEP.'”

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Calumet County Department of Human Services v. Randall H. · Stancourt v. Worthington City School Dist., 07ap-835 (9-9-2008)

2. “as the outer parameters of `educational placement' that it means something more than the actual school attended by the child and something less than the child's ultimate educational goals.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Navarro Carrilo v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ. · Calumet County Department of Human Services v. Randall H.

3. “The equitable balancing reserved for preliminary injunctions has no place in this context. * * * If we were, in the instant case, to import these equitable factors into the stay-put provision, we would dilute the statutory framework. [The child] has been deemed eligible for assistance under the IDEA; the statute guarantees that he and his parents be able to rely on an uninterrupted education during a contest between the school board and the parents.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Board of Education of Oak Park & River Forest High School District Number 200 v. Illinois State Board of Education · 10 F. Supp. 2d 971 - BD. OF EDUC., DIST. NO. 200 v. Ill. Bd. of Educ.