Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 F.3d 868 - Amrut N. Patel v. James F. Penman

Amrut N. Patel v. James F. Penman’s Empirical Analysis

103 F.3d 868 · 1996

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Yeti by Molly Ltd Montana Corporation, Gilbrook v. City of Westminster (1999)

40 federal appellate · 8 district ·

620199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Connor · Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Albright v. Oliver · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · City of New Orleans v. Dukes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he requirement that the motion be made at the close of all evidence is to be strictly observed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “manifest miscarriage of justice. " Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868 , 878 (9th Cir. 1996). "This exception, however, permits only extraordinarily deferential review that is limited to whether there was any evidence to support the jury's verdict, irrespective of its sufficiency.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[n]o evidence whatsoever was presented to the jury to prove that the [petitioners] were given notice and an opportunity to be heard after the closure of the motel.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.