15639b v. Dar P Sampson’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2018
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Shalala v. Schaefer · Sprague v. Bowen · Kali v. Bowen · George L. Barry v. Otis R. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unless the court finds that the position of the United States was substantially justified.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(A). The district court denied the motion on the grounds that the ALJ did not lack evidence regarding the two issues in which it failed to make determinations. Rather, the ALJ failed to properly evaluate that evidence. The district court then held that when there is”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Id. (citations and internal quotations omitted). 2 Under the EAJA, a court shall award attorney's fees to a prevailing party in a civil action against the United States unless”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.