McKinnon v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis
103 F.3d 934 · 1996
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2016
7 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Payton v. New York · Stone v. Powell · United States v. Santana · McKinnon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]s in [Santana] the suspect was visible, standing in the threshold of his doorway, open to public view. He was in a place sufficiently public that he had no legitimate expectation of privacy.”; suspect also acknowledged authority of police); United States v. Vaneaton, 49 F.3d 1423, 1427 (9th Cir.1995) (suspect who saw police approach and answered their knock voluntarily”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cox v. State“[t]he officers did not inappropriately enter McKinnon's home.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McClish v. Nugent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.