Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

103 Fla. 75

137 So 1

Orders v. White

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 14, 1931

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1931-10-14

Relies on State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1931-10-14

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1994

7 state decisions

201931194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Buford, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the judgment herein should be reversed, conditioned on remittitur; while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Davis are of opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed. Affirmed.

¶2 Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J. J., concur.

/103/fla/75 · .json · Public domain