McIntyre v. Codman & Shurtleff, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2012
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries Inc Securities and Exchange Commission · IMFC Professional Services of Florida, Inc. v. Latin American Home Health, Inc. · Preaseau v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · In re Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“more related to avoiding multiple litigation rather than federal jurisdiction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“should be freely given when justice so requires,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.