Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

103 F. Supp. 404

Tobin v. Abelson

U.S. District Court

Decided November 28, 1951

U.S. District Court · decided 1951-11-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1957

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Barton v. Barbour · Bellavance v. Plastic-Craft Novelty Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1951-11-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DARR, Chief Judge.

¶1The plaintiff has moved to strike the defendants’ demand for a jury to try the issues.

¶2This suit is brought by the Secretary of. Labor of the United States to enjoin the defendants from violating the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. Act of June 25, 1938, c. 676, 52 Stat. 1060; Act of October 26, 1949, c. 736, 63 Stat. 910; U.S.C.A. Title 29, § 201, et seq.

¶3The defendants have answered denying the applicability of the Act, and have demanded a jury to try the issues.

¶4The relief sought is an injunction and is therefore equitable in nature. In such cases trial by jury is not a matter of right. Barton v. Barbour, 104 U.S. 126, 26 L.Ed. 672; National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin, 301 U.S. 1, 57 S.Ct. 615, 81 L.Ed. 893 ; Ryan Distributing Corp. v. Caley, D.C., 51 F.Supp. 377; Bellavance v. Plastic-Craft Novelty Co., D.C., 30 F. Supp. 37.

¶5This rule is applicable in actions to restrain violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Walling, Adm’r v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co., Inc., D. C., 52 F.Supp. 670; Fleming, Adm’r v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co., D. C., 38 F.Supp. 1001.

¶6Plaintiff’s motion will be allowed.

¶7Order accordingly.

/103/fsupp/404 · .json · Public domain