103 F. Supp. 64 - Austrian v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently September 1979 · most notably 485 F. Supp. 629 - Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank (1979), Rieser v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad (1955)
14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 501 · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 28 U.S.C. § 1961
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Pepper v. Litton · D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the fact of control of the common property held and exercised, not the particular means by which or manner in which the control is exercised, that creates the fiduciary obligation.” Southern Pac. Co. v. Bogert, 250 U.S. 483, 492 , 39 S.Ct. 533, 537 , 63 L.Ed. 1099 (1919).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.