Torras v. Stradley’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 1994
11 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 55 · 5 U.S.C. § 1005
Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Cobbledick v. United States · Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States · Morgan v. United States · Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A witness summoned to testify in such an investigation has no right to control the manner of conducting the investigation or its secrecy by insisting upon having his own stenographer present to report the interview. The mere convenience of the witness will not support such a demand as against the Treasury Department policy and practice; nor may the witness raise any inference of unfairness as a basis for such a demand. There is a presumption in favor of regularity of official actions.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Neil
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.