103 F. Supp. 2d 1244 - Herrera v. Singh’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1854 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 29 U.S.C. § 1801 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1821 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1822 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1823 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 1854 (Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A. · 100 Wash. 2d 581 - Bowers v. Transamerica Title Insurance
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.