Scholl v. QualMed, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 5 U.S.C. § 8901 (Federal Employees Benefits Improvement Act of 1986) · 5 U.S.C. § 8902 · 5 U.S.C. § 8913
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Neitzke v. Williams · Kost v. Kozakiewicz · Kay Anjelino v. The New York Times Company · Piecknick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Congress delegated authority to OPM to promulgate regulations implementing FEHBA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re LymeCare, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.