State v. Rabago’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2024
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich · 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen · State v. Timley · State v. Arceo · Briones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a single offense may be committed in more than one way[.]”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Young. · State v. Kalaola“(1) Any person who: (a) Either resides in the same home with a minor under the age of fourteen years or has recurring access to the minor; and (b) Engages in three or more acts of sexual penetration or sexual contact with the minor over a period of time, but while the minor is under the age of fourteen years, is guilty of the offense of continuous sexual assault of a minor under the age of fourteen years. (2) To convict under this section, the trier of fact, if a jury, need unanimously agree only that the requisite number of acts have occurred; the jury need not agree on which acts constitute the requisite number.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Taomae v. Lingle · State v. Young.“a continuous, unlawful act or series of acts set on foot by a single impulse and operated by an unintermittent force, however long a time it may occupy, or an offense which continues day by day, or a breach of the criminal law, not terminated by a single act or fact, but subsisting for a definite period and intended to cover or apply to successive similar obligations or occurrences.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Ramsey · State v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.