Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 HAW 68 - State v. Martin

State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kelly v. Robinson · State v. Richie · United States v. Kragness · United States v. Lemm · State v. Gaylord

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, to constitute an abuse[,] it must appear that the court clearly exceeded the bounds of reason or disregarded rules or principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of a party litigant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]hile a sentence may be authorized by a constitutionally valid statute, its imposition may be reviewed for plain and manifest abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he court is of the opinion that a fine is specially adapted to the deterrence of the crime involved or to the correction of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.