Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Idaho 892 - State v. Brooks

State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably State v. Broadhead (1991), State v. Rutan (1984)

27 state decisions

10019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Dutton v. Evans · Frazier v. Cupp · Cree v. Goldstein · Babich v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Affidavits indicating prejudice or an absence of prejudice in the community where the defendant was tried, testimony of the jurors at voir dire as to whether they had formed an opinion of the defendant’s guilt or innocence based upon adverse pretrial publicity, whether the defendant challenged for cause any of the jurors finally selected, the nature and content of the pretrial publicity, and the amount of time elapsed from the time of the pretrial publicity to the trial itself. Publicity by itself does not require a change of venue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “sufficient evidence to permit the trial court reasonably to infer that there existed a conspiracy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]ith little exception, the courts of other jurisdictions which have considered the question of the quantum of proof necessary to be established by independent evidence, to render admissible the extrajudicial statements of an alleged co-conspirator in a criminal case, have held or recognized that the independent evidence must establish a prima facie case of conspiracy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.