Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Gacy

103 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Gacy’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

134
cited by 134 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 115 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 134 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2021 · most notably Morgan v. Illinois (1992), 128 Ill. 2d 66 - People v. Flores (1989)

16 federal appellate · 115 state decisions

63019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · Gregg v. Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In reviewing the sufficiency of the complaint [for a search warrant] we are guided by the Supreme Court's statement in Spinelli v. United States (1969), 393 U.S. 410 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , `that only the probability, and not a prima facie showing, of criminal activity is the standard of probable cause, Beck v. Ohio [(1964), 379 U.S. 89, 96 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142, 147-48 , 85 S.Ct. 223, 228 ]; that affidavits of probable cause are tested by much less rigorous standards than those governing the admissibility of evidence at trial, McCray v. Illinois [(1967), 386 U.S. 300, 311 , 18 L.Ed.2d 62, 70 , 87 S.Ct. 1056, 1062 ]; that in judging probable cause issuing magistrates are not to be confined by niggardly limitations or by restrictions on the use of their common sense, United States v. Ventresca [(1965), 380 U.S. 102, 108 , 13 L.Ed.2d 684, 688 , 85 S.Ct. 741, 745 ]; and that their determination of probable cause should be paid great deference by reviewing courts, Jones v. United States [(1960), 362 U.S. 257, 270-71 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697, 708 , 80 S.Ct. 725,735-36 ].' ( 393 U.S. 410, 419 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637, 645 , 89 S.Ct. 584, 590-91 .)"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We need not address the argument whether the jury was required to accept that the collective expert testimony in this case established that defendant was suffering from an extreme mental or emotional disturbance. As the People correctly point out, the decision at sentencing in a capital case is a balancing process. (People v. Brownell (1980), 79 Ill. 2d 508 .) While many labels were placed on defendant’s mental condition, all of the People’s experts characterized defendant’s defect as a personality or character disorder.” (People v. Gacy (1984), 103 Ill. 2d 1, 101-02 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “But the slaughter continued until the disappearance of 15 year old Robert Piest on December 11, 1978. Piest vanished after telling his mother that he was going to see a building contractor about a summer job. The presence of Gacy's truck outside the place where Piest was to meet his potential employer led to Gacy's arrest within two days. 2 The discovery of so many skeletons, several with rags stuffed in the victims' mouths, created a national sensation. Gacy regaled the police with stories about his exploits, which he attributed to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.