103 Ind. App. 16 - Willard v. Bringolf’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2007 · most notably Kerfoot v. Kessener (1949), Wienke v. Lynch (1980)
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Indianapolis v. Kingsbury · Smith v. Wells Manufacturing Co. · Mishawaka St. Joseph. L. T. Co. v. Neu, Gdn. · Gregory v. Arms · Anderson v. Hubble
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'all degrees and grades of evidence from the most directive and positive proof to the slightest circumstances from which a court or jury would be justified in inferring notice.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a mere question of fact and is open to every species of legitimate evidence which may tend to strengthen or impair the conclusion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'and charge a subsequent grantee with notice of all that is shown by the record.''”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.