103 Ind. App. 494 - Lindeman v. Lindeman’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1952
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp. · 97 Ind. App. 592 - Humphrey v. Pleasure Park Company · 96 Ind. App. 428 - McNeil v. Russell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellants do not deny that this evidence is omitted but say that in the event they have omitted any part of the evidence that it is the duty of appellees to supply the omitted parts. In this contention appellants are mistaken as it is not the duty of appellees to supply the omissions in appellants’ brief, but appellees have the right to assume that the rule above mentioned, which requires an appellant to set out a condensed recital of the evidence in narrative form, will be uniformly enforced by the court. . . .” (Our italics.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.