Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 KAN 422 - Henderson v. Bell

Henderson v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
8
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably Barnhart v. McKinney (1984), Gore v. Beren (1994)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

7019181920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Winsor v. Mills · Lasnier v. Berthiaume · Starcher Bros. v. Duty · Woodall v. Bruen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`And it is also agreed that should first parties [Bell] elect to sell the following 40 acres now occupied by them, to-wit: The N.W. 1/4 of the S.W. 1/4 of Section 10-7-21, in Atchison County, Kansas, the second parties [Buchanans] shall have the right to purchase said last mentioned 40 at the agreed price of $65 an acre. It is further agreed that if said parties [Buchanans] elect to sell [the land actually purchased under the contract] at any time in the future, the first parties shall have the right to purchase same at the agreed price of $65 an acre, provided first parties will also buy the balance of the above described land at the agreed price of $40 an acre.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It follows that the Buchanans (option-ees) and those holding under them, either as assignees or heirs, would hold a right to obtain an interest in the property running for an indefinite period of time. That right would be held in violation of the rule against perpetuities.” (Emphasis ours.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “All the authorities do not hold in accordance with this rule. [Citation omitted.] But the rule announced appears to be supported by better reasoning, and is more consistent with sound public policy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.