Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 KAN 508 - Hamblin v. Marchant

Hamblin v. Marchant’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
10
states following
April 1987
most recently cited

4 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 1987 · most notably Lore v. Habermeyer (1952), In Re Estate of Foster (1958)

4 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 10 states

9019181920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Perry v. Strawbridge · McAllister v. Fair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * Whether the person to whom the property would ordinarily go took the owner's life is a question that must be judicially determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. The Legislature has seen fit to say that that fact must be ascertained in a criminal prosecution in which the person who would take the property is charged with killing the owner. When that fact is ascertained, the property is not then taken from the person who would inherit, but it is then determined that the person never did inherit, and never did acquire any interest in the property. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"The statute is not penal; it does not add anything to the punishment of the person convicted; neither does it provide for a forfeiture; and nothing is taken from the person convicted...." ( 103 Kan. at 510 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.