Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 KAN 698 - Foresman v. Foresman

Foresman v. Foresman’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
November 1983
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1983

7 state decisions

3019181920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gordon v. Munn · Larkin v. Wilson · Butts v. Butts · Denton v. Fyfe · Alward v. Lobingier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a claimant out of possession who has open to him the remedy of ejectment cannot escape a jury trial of the question of fact on which his claim depends by presenting that issue in some form of equitable action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.