Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 KY 282 - Sharp v. Bowlar

Sharp v. Bowlar’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
October 1932
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1st. That the communication was made by the defendant in good faith, without malice, not voluntarily, but in answer to an inquiry, and in the reasonable protection of his own interest or performance of a duty to society. “2nd. That the defendant must honestly believe the communication to be true. “3d. There must have been reasonable or probable grounds known to him for the suspicion. “4th. That the communication, if made in answer to an inquiry, must not go further than to truly state the facts upon which the suspicion was grounded, and to satisfy the inquirer that there were reasons for the suspicion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.