Lawrence v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
2 district · 103 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 112 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2013 · most notably Elkins v. United States (1960), Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado (1949)
2 district · 103 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boyd v. United States · Albert Adams v. People of the State of New York · Blum v. State · Gindrat v. People · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Concurrence of action on a material point is sufficient to enable a jury to presume concurrence of sentiment, and from this the actual fact of conspiracy may be inferred.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.