Shand v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2019
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Jizmejian v. United States · Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Whitworth Bros. Storage Co. · Department of Transportation v. Armacost · State v. Lyles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Evidence relating to victim’s chastity. — Evidence relating to a victim’s reputation for chastity and opinion evidence relating to a victim’s chastity are not admissible in any prosecution for commission of a rape or sexual offense in the first or second degree. Evidence of specific instances of the victim’s prior sexual conduct may be admitted only if the judge finds the evidence is relevant and is material to a fact in issue in the case and that its inflammatory or prejudicial nature does not outweigh its probative value, and if the evidence is: * * * * (2) Evidence of specific instances of sexual activity showing the source or origin of semen, pregnancy, disease, or trauma____”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““And I can sum this whole case up in one word, if I could, and that word is trade. “We believe that the evidence will show that this case is based upon a trade, a trade between [the victim] and Mr. Shand, a trade which included— “[THE STATE]: Objection, your Honor. “THE COURT: Sustained. “[THE STATE]: For reasons already stated. “THE COURT: Sustained.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shand v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.