Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 MINN 428 - State v. Zempel

State v. Zempel’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 1953
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1953

8 state decisions

40190819101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mobile Fruit & Trading Co. v. Potter · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In charging the jury the court shall state to them all matters of law which it thinks necessary for their information in rendering a verdict, and, if it shall present the facts of the case, shall, in addition, inform the jury that they are the exclusive judges of all questions of fact.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.