Drosten v. Mueller’s Empirical Analysis
1890
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1930
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The presumption arising from the spoliation of documents must be applied with judgment and sound discretion. * * * We see no intention on her part [in destroying the paper] to commit a fraud on any one.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mastin v. Noble
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.