Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 MO 78 - Hundley v. Farris

Hundley v. Farris’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
October 1928
most recently cited

1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 1928

1 district · 15 state decisions

601890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murrill v. Neill · Phelps v. McNeely · R. W. Smith & Co. v. Mallory's Ex'r · Level v. Farris · Shackelford's Administrator v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The .joint creditors of the partnership, while all the partners are living and solvent, can enforce no claim against the joint effects or the separate effects of the partners, except by a common action at law. It is only in cases where there is a dissolution by the death or bankruptcy of one partner that •the right of the joint creditors can attach, as a quasi lien upon the partnership effects, as a derivative, subordinate right, under and through the lien and equity of the partners.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.