Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 N.C. 66 - Whitehead v. . Spivey

Whitehead v. . Spivey’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1967
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Thurber. Whyland & Co. v. LaRoque · Faulcon v. . Johnson · Bonner v. Stotesbury. · Burton v. . Spiers · Marshburn v. . Lashlie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The appellant seeks to help his cause of action and his case in this Court by introducing here, summarily, substantially a new cause of action, one that has arisen since this action began and since this appeal was taken. The defendant has had no opportunity to contest its application or bearing in this action. Indeed the effect of allowing the motion as to this Court might, probably would be, to recast the action in material respects, and allow the plaintiff to assign new grounds of error as to rulings never made in the court below. This could not be thought of for a moment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.