Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 N.C. App. 1 - State v. West

103 N.C. App. 1 - State v. West’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably 133 N.C. App. 531 - State v. Campbell (1999), State v. Gibson (1992)

45 state decisions

330199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rust v. Johnson · State v. Coffey · State v. Bullard · State v. Wilkerson · State v. Redfern

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake, entrapment or accident.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When prior incidents are offered for a proper purpose, the ultimate test of admissibility is whether they are sufficiently similar and not so remote as to run afoul of the balancing test between probative value and prejudicial effect set out in Rule 403.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is a general rule of inclusion of [evidence of other crimes, wrong, or acts], subject to an exception if its only probative value is to show that the defendant has the propensity or disposition to commit an offense of the nature of the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.