Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 N.C. App. 195 - State v. Patterson

103 N.C. App. 195 - State v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2013

12 state decisions

60199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tate v. United States · State v. Rogers · State v. Wilson · State v. Vandiver · State v. Vandiver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “points out the seeming non-difficulty of interpretation of the first sub-part: It can scarcely be doubted that an assertion made in words is intended by the declarant to be an assertion. Hence verbal assertions readily fall into the category of `statement.' The State quotes Moskowitz , for the proposition that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[ United States v. Moskowitz, 581 F.2d 14, 21 (2d cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 871 , 99 S.Ct. 204 , 58 L.Ed.2d 184 (1978)]. Reasoning from the language in the State Commentary to Rule 801(a)(1), we view a sketch as but a silent depiction or replication of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “and, therefore, not subject to the hearsay rules, as a preliminary matter. In that sense, the composites here are not analogous to photographs because the sketches are not necessarily an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.