Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “While conceding that there is no evidence in the record that defendant knew or should have known of the existence of the substance, the . . . [court] below held that defendant is entitled to summary judgment ‘only if it meets its burden of showing that it did not know, and should not have known,’ of the presence of the substance[.]... [Defendant] demonstrated that plaintiff could not produce evidence to prove an essential element of her case — that defendant knew or should have known of the existence of the substance [.] . . . [Defendant was not required to produce evidence showing that it did not know or should not have known of the substance[.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 171 N.C. App. 403 - Duncan v. Cuna Mutual Insurance Society