Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 N.C. App. 783 - Shingledecker v. Shingledecker

103 N.C. App. 783 - Shingledecker v. Shingledecker’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2018

14 state decisions

60199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc. · Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc. · Crump v. Bd. of Education · Matter of Computer Tech. Corp. · Brooks v. . Brooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A court of this State authorized to decide child custody matters has jurisdiction to make a child custody determination by initial or modification decree if: (1) This State (i) is the home state of the child at the time of commencement of the proceeding, ... or (2) It is in the best interest of the child that a court of this State assume jurisdiction because (i) the child and the child’s parents, or the child and at least one contestant, have a significant connection with this State, and (ii) there is available in this State substantial evidence relevant to the child’s present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships; or (3) The child is physically present in this State and (i) the child has been abandoned or (ii) it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child has been subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse or is otherwise neglected or dependent....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “failed to allege that the actions were perpetrated without adequate provocation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “personal jurisdiction over ... nonresident is not required under the [UCCJEA]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.