Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Nev. 512 - Allan v. State

Allan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2007

4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

60198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Harris v. New York · Dennis v. United States · United States v. Knox · Seim v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he shield provided by Miranda cannot be perverted into a license to use perjury by way of a defense, free from the risk of confrontation with prior, inconsistent utterances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.