Pendleton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
January 1995
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Brewer v. Williams · Fort Leavenworth Co v. Lowe · United States v. Gliatta
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant has the burden of showing the applicability of negative exceptions in jurisdictional statutes. State v. Buckaroo Jack, 30 Nev. 325 [ 96 P. 497 ] (1908); State v. Mendez, 57 Nev. 192, 209 , 61 P.2d 300 , 305 (1936). Once the state produces evidence that the crime took place in the county, it is incumbent upon the defendant to prove that the incident took place on lands over which the United States has exclusive jurisdiction. Id. There being no such evidence in the record, we conclude that the courts of this state had jurisdiction to try Pendleton.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.