Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 N.J. 252 - State v. Hartley

State v. Hartley’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
6
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

151 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Bey (1988), State v. Gerald (1988)

151 state decisions

6601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3501

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Leon · Edwards v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “before an accused's previously-asserted right to remain silent may be deemed to have been `scrupulously honored,' law-enforcement authorities must, at a minimum, readminister the Miranda warnings.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “independent of the requirement that any waiver be knowing, intelligent and voluntary,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[c]are must be taken ... that there be no blurring of the separate lines of analysis that are followed in respect of the “scrupulously honor” requirement on the one hand and the waiver issue on the other. The distinction between the two concepts stands out in bold relief in this case: given our holding that the failure scrupulously to honor a previously-invoked right to silence renders urwomtituticmally compelled any resultant incriminating statement made in response to custodial interrogation, there can he no question of waiver. [ 103 N.J. at 261 , 511 A.2d 80 (emphasis added) ].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.