Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 NJSUPER 24 - W. v. H.

W. v. H.’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 1994

8 state decisions

401968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 46 N.J. Super. 284 - Sobel v. Sobel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is against the policy of the court to grant permission to resume a maiden name where unemancipated children who bear a different name are involved”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “father's right to have his progeny bear his name.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.