State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2013 · most notably State v. Coffin (1999), State v. Trujillo (2002)
2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Pointer v. Texas · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Fahy v. Connecticut · 103 Wash. 2d 165 - State v. Ryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Ambiguity — the danger that the meaning intended by the declarant will be misinterpreted by the witness and hence the jury; (2) Lack of candor — the danger the declarant will consciously lie; (3) Faulty memory — the danger that the declarant simply forgets key material; and (4) Misperception — the danger that the declarant misjudged, misinterpreted, or misunderstood what he saw.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lopez · State v. Williams“[a] statement not specifically covered by any of the [other] exceptions [in Rule 11-804] but having circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, if the court determines that (a) the statement is offered as evidence of a material fact; (b) the statement is more probative on the point for which it is offered than any other evidence which the proponent can procure through reasonable efforts; and (c) the general purposes of these rules and the interests of justice -will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Coffin · State v. Gurule
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.