Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 N.M. 472 - State v. Warren

State v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
3
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably State v. TYWAYNE H. (1997), State v. Salas (1999)

34 state decisions

1601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · Williams v. Florida · Comley v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a misdemeanor is committed in the presence of a police officer [leaving the scene to avoid arrest] and information of such is promptly placed on the police radio or otherwise communicated and a description of the misdemeanant given, the arrest of the misdemeanent by another police officer within a reasonable time of receipt of the information is valid.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[The warrant requirement] is not an inconvenience to be somehow “weighed” against the claims of police efficiency. It is, or should be, an important working part of our machinery of government, operating as a matter of course to check the “well-intentioned but mistakenly over-zealous executive officers” who are a part of any system of law enforcement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In the absence of some exigency or cooperative police effort, the police-team exception probably should not be invoked. To randomly apply the exception would effectively emasculate the felony-misdemeanor distinction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.