Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 N.M. 623 - State v. Cobbs

State v. Cobbs’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
6
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

89 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably State v. Jason L. (2000), State v. Flores (1996)

89 state decisions

39019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Brignoni-Ponce · Ybarra v. Illinois · Angrist v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(aln officer who stops a suspect on reasonable suspicion of such an offense may conduct a protective search.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “given the totality of the circumstances, there was an ample measure of reasonable suspicion necessary to justify [the officer's] decision to frisk the defendant. Otherwise, it would be manifestly absurd to require a police officer to await the glint of steel before he can act to protect his safety.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “the right to frisk is automatic whenever[ ] the suspect has been stopped upon the suspicion that he has committed, was committing, or was about to commit a type of crime for which the offender would likely be armed{[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.