Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 N.M. 731 - State v. Shirley

State v. Shirley’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2020

14 state decisions

8019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. Delgado · State v. Turner · State v. Perez · State v. Ellenberger · State v. Volpato

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) it will probably change the result if a new trial is granted; (2) it must have been discovered since the trial; (3) it could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of due diligence; (4) it must be material; (5) it must not be merely cumulative; and (6) it must not be merely impeaching or contradictory.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.