State v. Earnest’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2020
2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · United States v. Jorn · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Douglas v. Alabama · United States v. Dinitz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was highly prejudicial, violated defendant's confrontation rights, and deprived defendant of meaningful cross-examination,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Forbes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.