103 Ohio App. 3d 333 - Williams v. Oeder’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably 148 Ohio App. 3d 293 - State v. Urbin (2002), 533 F. App'x 509 - Carolyn Baker v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (2013)
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Krischbaum v. Dillon · 104 Wash. 2d 677 - Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co. · Snyder v. Stanford · 369 So. 2d 523 - Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc. · 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 51 - Eller v. Koehler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'a plaintiff must show (1) an invasion affecting an interest in the exclusive possession of his property, (2) an intentional doing of the act which results in the invasion; (3) a reasonable foreseeability that the act done could result in an invasion of the plaintiff's possessory interest; and (4) substantial damages to the res.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Where the trial court misstates the law or creates an ambiguity in a portion of its jury instructions, it is not reversible error where the court's instructions, considered as a whole, are not prejudicial to the objecting party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the invasion of airborne particulates may interfere with a complainant's interest in exclusive possession and may therefore constitute a trespass.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.