Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Ohio App. 3d 465 - Smith v. Sushka

103 Ohio App. 3d 465 - Smith v. Sushka’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pons v. Ohio State Medical Board · Lorain City School District Board of Education v. State Employment Relations Board · Board of Education v. State Board of Education · In re Termination of Employment of Pratt · State ex rel. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc. v. Lancaster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In reviewing an order of an administrative agency, an appellate court’s role is more limited than that of a trial court reviewing the same order. It is incumbent on the trial court to examine the evidence. Such is not the charge of the appellate court. The appellate court is to determine only if the trial court has abused its discretion. An abuse of discretion * * implies not merely error of judgment, but perversity of will, passion, prejudice, partiality, or moral delinquency.’ ” State ex rel. Commercial Lovelace Motor Freight, Inc. v. Lancaster (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 191, 193 , 22 OBR 275, 277, 489 N.E.2d 288, 290 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The court may affirm the order of the agency complained of in the appeal if it finds, upon consideration of the entire record and such additional evidence as the court has admitted, that the order is supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence and is in accordance with law.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “* * * is that those employees in the classified service can be removed only for good cause pursuant to the procedures of R.C. 124.34 . Employees in the unclassified service are not entitled to this protection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.