Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 OHIOST3D 134 - State v. Brooks

State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

397
cited by 397 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

397 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 397 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably State v. Foster (2006), State v. Bezak (2007)

397 state decisions

1700200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Comer · Woods v. Telb · Hughes v. Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles · 142 Ohio App. 3d 274 - State v. McPherson · Adkins v. McFaul

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 397 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the conditions are violated. To comply with the literal terms of the statute, the judge should not simply notify the offender that if the community control conditions are violated, he or she will receive”
    61 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “If the sentencing court determines at the sentencing hearing that a community control sanction should be imposed and the court is not prohibited from imposing a community control sanction, the court shall impose a community control sanction. The court shall notify the offender that, if the conditions of the sanction are violated, if the offender commits a violation of any law, or if the offender leaves this state without the permission of the court or the offender's probation officer, the court may impose a longer time under the same sanction, may impose a more restrictive sanction, or may impose a prison term on the offender and shall indicate the specific prison term that may be imposed as a sanction for the violation, as selected by the court from the range of prison terms for the offense pursuant to section 2929.14 of the Revised Code.”
    37 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he matter must be remanded to the trial court for a resentencing under that provision with a prison term not an option.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.