State ex rel. Keith v. McMonagle’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
89 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably State ex rel. Board of State Teachers Retirement System v. Davis (2007), State ex rel. Downs v. Panioto (2006)
89 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ. · State ex rel. White v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority · State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority · 142 Ohio App. 3d 694 - Bell v. Horton · State ex rel. A & D Limited Partnership v. Keefe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A judgment that leaves issues unresolved and contemplates that further action must be taken is not a final appealable order.”
20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'A judgment that leaves issues unresolved and contemplates that further action must be taken is not a final appealable order.' " Id., quoting State ex rel. Keith v. McMonagle, 103 Ohio St.3d 430 , 2004-Ohio-5580 , ¶ 4. {¶ 13} "An order which adjudicates one or more but fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties must meet the requirements of R.C. 2505.02 and Civ.R. 54(B) in order to be final and appealable.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We hold that a judgment in an action which determines a claim in that action and has the effect of rendering moot all other claims in the action as to all other parties to the action is a final appealable order pursuant to R.C. 2505.02, and Civ.R. 54(B) is not applicable to such a judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.