Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 OHIOST3D 508 - State v. Adams

State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

190
cited by 190 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 184 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 190 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. Conway (2006), State v. Johnson (2010)

3 federal appellate · 184 state decisions

960200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Estelle v. McGuire · State v. Bradley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 190 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the restraint or movement of the victim is merely incidental to a separate underlying crime, there exists no separate animus sufficient to sustain separate convictions; however, where the restraint is prolonged, the confinement is secretive, or the movement is substantial so as to demonstrate a significance independent of the other offense, there exists a separate animus as to each offense sufficient to support separate convictions.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “so serious that counsel was not functioning as the 'counsel' guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “subjects the victim to a substantial increase in risk of harm separate and apart from * * * the underlying crime, there exists a separate animus.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.