Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 OHIOST3D 580 - State v. White

State v. White’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

282
cited by 282 later decisions
2
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

282 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 282 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably State v. Joseph (2010), 153 Ohio St. 3d 497 - State v. Beasley (2018)

282 state decisions

1450200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fuller v. Oregon · James v. Strange · Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission · Bernardini v. Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 282 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all criminal cases, including violations of ordinances, the judge or magistrate shall include in the sentence the costs of prosecution and render a judgment against the defendant for such costs.”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “R.C. 2947.23 does not prohibit a court from assessing costs against an indigent defendant; rather it requires a court to assess costs against all convicted defendants.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a trial court may assess court costs against an indigent defendant convicted of a felony as part of the sentence and * * * a clerk of courts may attempt the collection of court costs assessed against an indigent defendant.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.