Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 Okla. 150 - Scott v. Price

Scott v. Price’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2021

11 state decisions

4019241930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Indiana Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. McCrory · Rashaw v. Straus Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]irst : [t]he fact that there is imminent danger that unless a receiver is appointed the property or its proceeds will be deteriorated in value or wasted during the pendency of the suit; [s]econd : [t]he fact that the plaintiff will suffer irreparable loss . . . . But if the defendant is solvent and abundantly able to respond to any such loss, or if he will give good bond so to respond, the loss can rarely be irreparable . . . . [; and, t]hird : [t]he fact that on the pleadings and preliminary proofs there is a strong probability that the plaintiff will ultimately prevail on the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where the petition for the appointment of a receiver fails to state .facts sufficient to show that the delay which would result in giving notice of the application to the adverse party would defeat petitioner’s rights or result in injury to him, it is error for the court to appoint a receiver without notice. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.