State v. Rosasco’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2019
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Cook · United States v. Britton · State v. Duestrow · State v. Abbey · Hansen v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In prosecutions of this act, whether begun by indictment, complaint or information, * * it shall not be necessary * * for the state to allege or prove that the party charged * * was not within any of the exceptions provided by this act.” See State v. London, 99 Or. 189 ( 195 Pac. 344 ); State v. Busick, 90 Or. 466 ( 177 Pac. 64 ); State v. Wilbur, 85 Or. 565 ( 166 Pac. 51 ); Sustar v. County Court of Marion County, 101 Or. 657 ( 201 Pac. 445 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pack v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.