Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 103 ORAPP 296 - State v. Thornton

State v. Thornton’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “had admitted kicking in the victim's door and stealing several items but had claimed that someone else must have taken the rest. We held that the defendant's criminal activities caused the loss of all the items, because, by kicking in the door, he had created free access to the house for the hypothetical second thief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “theft of the car stereo is not a criminal activity attributable to defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.