103 Or. App. 436 - State v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"statements made for some purpose other than to acknowledge guilt, i.e. , exculpatory statements or statements made as part of a person's employment duties, are not confessions. It follows, then, that a 'confession' must have been made after the commission of the crime in question, for the purpose of acknowledging that the speaker is guilty of some criminal offense."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“only means that there must be evidence from which an inference may be drawn that tends to establish that a crime has been committed by the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The sufficiency of the evidence in this case depends on whether the statement [to the officer] was an admission or a confession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.